Summary
Author of Chapter 6 of Rethinking Statehood in Palestine, “Transitional Justice in Palestine/Israel: Whose Justice? Which Transition?”, the opening chapter of Part Two, “Decolonizing beyond Partition” (Rethinking Statehood in Palestine, PDF p.172).
Details
- The chapter examines the significance of Transitional justice in Palestine/Israel, defined as dealing with past wrongs in order to shift towards a new democratic regime (PDF p.172).
- Its two claims: transitional justice has gained appeal in the Palestinian camp as a tool to counter fragmentation, reckon with past wrongs and provide venues for reconciliation with Israeli Jews; and it is a deeply contested concept that can serve alternatives to Oslo, Oslo-line measures, or even the negation of Palestinian demands for justice (PDF p.172).
- Its conclusion is precautionary: harnessing transitional justice depends on a larger political project that seeks equality and justice for all Palestinians — “If we do not do it, someone else is bound to do it for us” (PDF p.184).
- His earlier work cited in the chapter includes “National Narratives and the Oslo Peace Process”, Nations and Nationalism 22, no. 3 (2016): 465-83 (PDF p.186, n.21).
Related pages
Rethinking Statehood in Palestine, Transitional justice, Nadim Rouhana, Nakba